A comprehensive guide on how to use the IQTVE structure to score full marks in high school essay writing.
Author: Nelson Luo (Founder & Principal)
A parent once told us that her son had been scoring in the top 10% for writing all throughout his preparation for the Selective test.
He was particularly strong in persuasive writing, where he mastered the use of the PEEL structure to structure his responses.
Carrying this into high school, this student was confident in his ability to structure his arguments.
But three weeks into Year 7, he came home with a marked body paragraph, with big red text saying his analysis was 'too surface level'...
PEEL stands for Point, Evidence, Explanation and Link. It's generally a clean and logical structure that forms the basis of persuasive, informative, or point-based writing that is taught in late primary school stages to help students structure their opinion pieces.
The thing is, high school English teachers are expecting more depth of analysis.
They will assess whether your child can analyse how an author constructs meaning, and why specific language choices create specific effects. That is a fundamentally different task from what PEEL asks students to do.
PEEL builds the habit of finding evidence and explaining it. High school English requires students to evaluate the choices behind that evidence.
Why the Shift Away From PEEL is Important
The NSW NESA English Kâ10 Syllabus (2022) for stage 4 (Year 7-10) requires students to âunderstand how language forms, features and structures, in a variety of texts, vary according to context, purpose and audience, and demonstrate this understanding through written, spoken, visual and multimodal responsesâ (NSW Education). In other words, as students reach junior high school, they are expected to identify and explain the effects of literary techniques, connect textual evidence to the composer's deliberate choices, and sustain analytical arguments across extended written responses.
PEEL structure, as taught across most primary school settings, focuses on finding evidence and explaining it in relation to a point. That is Stage 3 thinking, appropriate for Selective-level assessment.
Introducing IQTVE
At NL English Academy, we teach our high school students a structure called IQTVE for their essay paragraphs. IQTVE stands for Idea, Quote, Technique, Verb, Evaluation. When combined with a strong topic sentence and a closing link, it produces a strong analytical paragraph that high school markers reward.
Here is how each component works in practice.
Step 1: Topic Sentence
The topic sentence is the thesis of the paragraph. It states the specific idea your child is arguing and connects it directly to the essay question. Every paragraph should only have 1 topic sentence at the beginning, but the IQTVE structure can be applied multiple times to analyse multiple quotes in a paragraph.
Weak: "The author uses many techniques in this poem."
Strong: "The poet's use of extended metaphor throughout the poem reinforces the speaker's growing sense of isolation from the world around them."
The difference is specificity. The strong version tells the marker exactly what argument is being made, the theme of analysis, and what evidence will support it. From the topic sentence alone, the reader knows what this paragraph will prove.
It's like guiding the marker through your analysis by showing them a map instead of just giving a general direction. This makes it a lot easier for markers to understand your point and give you marks.
Step 2: Idea
The idea component is where many students either skip entirely or fold into the topic sentence. However, in a good paragraph, the two serve different purposes.
The topic sentence states the argument. The Idea introduces the significance and context of the evidence your child is about to present. It is the setup that gives the quote meaning before it arrives.
Think of it this way: before a lawyer presents evidence, they explain why it matters and what it will demonstrate. Students who jump straight to quoting are presenting evidence without context. This makes it difficult to present a well-rounded argument.
Step 3: Quote
Here your child selects a specific piece of textual evidence to support their argument. Here, one well-chosen, targeted quote is more powerful than a long extract that overwhelms the analysis.
Quotes should also appear in sequential order throughout your paragraph, as they appear in the text.
Authors build their central argument progressively across the entire piece. Students who select and sequence quotes in the order they appear demonstrate to the marker that they understand how the composer has constructed meaning across the whole text.
Step 4: Technique
Here your child identifies the specific literary or language technique operating within the quote they have chosen.
A common error at this stage is that many students will name the technique and just move on. "The author uses personification." This leaves the marker without any explanation of why the technique was chosen or what effect it creates.
Effective technique identification requires specificity. Rather than "the author uses repetition," a strong student identifies what is being repeated and why that specific instance is significant. Is it a recurring motif that has appeared throughout the poem? Is it a structural device that signals a turning point in the text? The more precise you are, the more analytical your paragraph will be.
Step 5: Verb
The analytical verb is one of the most overlooked components of a strong paragraph, and one of the easiest to improve once students are aware of it.
Your child's choice of verb determines how they explain the connection between the technique and its effect. Words like "demonstrates," "exemplifies," "elucidates," "reveals," "illustrates," and "reinforces" tell the marker what the technique achieves and why the composer chose it.
Weak: "The author uses imagery."
Purposeful: "The author employs vivid imagery to reinforce the character's overwhelming sense of entrapment."
The verb is the bridge of the sentence, between the quote and the start of the analytical evaluation. The right verb can springboard the analysis in the right direction to show you truly understand the significance and effect of your chosen evidence. We spend considerable time on this in our Selective and high school programs because the shift from passive description to active analytical language is one of the clearest indicators of a student writing at high school level.
Step 6: Evaluation
Evaluation is usually what distinguishes a high distinction response from a distinction response. This is the part where the student can demonstrate critical judgement and exercising their own opinion into the argument.
After identifying the technique and its effect, your child must evaluate: Why did the composer make this choice? What effect does it create on the reader? How does it connect to the broader thesis of the essay?
Step 7: Linking Sentence
The linking sentence closes the paragraph by reconnecting it to the essay's central thesis and the question prompt. There should only ever be one linking sentence per paragraph, after all the analysis of each quote has been done through the IQTVE structure.
A strong link references the key argument of the paragraph, connects it to the thesis, and creates a natural bridge toward what follows. It is the closing statement that brings the argument to a clean, purposeful full stop.
Putting IQTVE Into Practice
Weâre now going to walk through the IQTVE structure step by step.
This is a body paragraph that I wrote many years ago in year 12 when I was preparing for my HSC English Advanced paper.
I chose to include three IQTVE structures within my comparative essay body paragraph, which were based around quotes I took from the texts âThe Strangerâ (by Albert Camus) and âThe Meursault Investigationâ (by Kamel Daoud) which I was studying at the time.
I want you to focus on understanding how I structured my analysis through the IQTVE structure and try to map each section of the paragraph to the acronyms. Please note that Iâve dissected the body paragraph into its respective parts so that itâs easier to see. Donât worry too much about understanding my argument (as this requires having context of the book).
TOPIC SENTENCE: Daoudâs postcolonial ekphrasis provocatively recontextualises Camusâ colonial novel, subverting hegemonic dominance over subalternity, whereby the focaliser Harun effectively appropriates the hegemonic language in attempt to restore âthe Arabâsâ erased identity, positioning readers to question and challenge our complicit stance on occidental privilege.
IQTVE 1: Notably, Camus portrays the divide from orientalist radical alterity during Franco-Algerian colonialism through the anthropomorphism âin that way of theirs⌠we were nothing but stones or dead treesâ revealing the dehumanisation of âthe otherâ, where Meursaultâs occidental privilege degrades âthe Arabsâ to justify his murder. In eradicating âthe Arabâsâ identity, Camus catalyses a textural conversation with Daoud who seeks to invert hegemonic dominance through a renewed postcolonial context, convincing readers in perfect prose to justify French oppression of the Arabic subaltern through an occidental lens.
IQTVE 2: However, through the metatextural conversation, Daoud reframes the suppressed subaltern narrative through Harunâs oriental lens, through the pastiche âthey watched us Arabs⌠as if we were nothing but stones or dead trees,â showcasing Harunâs appropriation of hegemonic language âstones or dead treesâ to âgive Musa a nameâ, symbolic of the subalternâs linguistic identity formerly erased, despite a renewed context amidst Algerian independence.
IQTVE 3: Therefore, Daoud, failing to reverse the cataclysmic repercussions of decolonisation on the subaltern identity through the conversation, accepts Camusâ hegemonic dominance in the metafiction â(Meursaultâs) storyâs too well written for me to get any ideas about imitating him,â confronting Meursaultâs âperfect proseâ inherent to occidental privilege, allowing Camus to shape empathy for a French murderer. Epitomising the subaltern status, Harun fails to âimitateâ occidental âperfect proseâ to manipulate readers in a postcolonial context, delineating the perpetual voicelessness of âthe Arabâ, further impelling decolonisationâs futility in reverting subaltern suppression.
LINKING SENTENCE: Hence, Daoudâs postcolonial novel indignantly reframes Camusâ colonial ekphrasis through a failed appropriation of hegemonic âperfect prose,â to thereby question and challenge readerâs complicit acceptance of subaltern erasure.
This example is quite an advanced analytical essay paragraph, so for late Year 6 and junior high schoolers, the aim should be to follow the same structure with clarity. Donât try to match this level of technical intricacy (remember this is from my final preparation for Year 12 English which is what your child should aim for when they are at that stage).
Aside from the advanced language, it should become quite evident upon reading how I structured each paragraph tightly to the IQTVE formula.
What Comes Next
IQTVE is the analytical writing standard that high school markers expect from Year 7 onwards.
For students in Year 5 or 6, the window before the high school transition is the most valuable time to build this foundation. Many students at this stage are also preparing for the Selective Test, and the writing habits they develop now carry directly into the analytical demands of Year 7 and beyond.
For students already in high school, IQTVE is a learnable structure at any stage. Year 7 through to Year 10 students who have not been explicitly taught it can apply it immediately to lift the quality of their written responses.
At NL English Academy, we teach IQTVE across our high school English programs through advanced theory modules and weekly homework with extensive written feedback, delivered in small classes by our ex-top Selective mentor team - so our students are equipped with polished skills that separate them from their cohort.
We are Australiaâs leading OC, Selective & High School English tutoring centre, and our personalised online programs are designed to secure leading success rates for students in Years 3-10 preparing for OC, Selective & High School English Exams.
Our results speak for themselves:
đ 96% Improve their skills after 1 term with NL English Academy
đ 78% Scored top 10% in Selective Reading or Writing (2025)
đ 72% Scored top 10% in OC Test Reading (2025)
đ 74% Ranked top 25% in their high school cohort (2025)
Admission to NL English Academy is highly selective and our term programs are by application only. We invest only in dedicated students who we are confident we can help.
Note: If you are already enrolled at NL English Academy, your child will not need to re-apply through our admission process. Our admission process is only required for new students.
All the best with your child's preparations.
Mr. Nelson Luo
Founder & Principal, NL English Academy
If you found this blog valuable, share it with a parent in your network who is preparing their child for their exams. Most families only discover these strategies once it is too late. You can be the reason someone gets a head start.
Source: https://curriculum.nsw.edu.au/learning-areas/english/english-k-10-2022/content/stage-4/faa12b8172
NL English Academy offers accelerated 10-week term programs, intensive holiday programs and self-guided online packs for ambitious students who seek to secure top exam marks.
Our students achieve top bands, cohort rankings & entry into their dream schools.
IMPORTANT: To maintain our leading success rates, term program admissions are strictly by application only. Only a handful of selected students are accepted.
As featured in...
We're proud to be the main sponsor of NSBHS Falcon Football Club.
Š 2026 NL English Academy. All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions |